Low growth temperature inhibition of photosynthesis in cotyledons of jack pine seedlings (<i>Pinus banksiana</i>) is due to impaired chloroplast development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cotyledons of jack pine seedlings (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) grown from seeds were expanded at low temperature (5°C), and total Chl content per unit area of cotyledons in these seedlings was only 57% of that observed for cotyledons on 20°C-grown controls. Chl a/b ratio of 5°C-grown jack pine was about 20% lower (2.3 ± 0.1) than 20°C controls (2.8 ± 0.3). Separation of Chl-protein complexes and SDS-PAGE indicated a significant reduction in the major Chl a containing complex of PSI (CP1) and PSII (CPa) relative to LHCII1in 5°C compared to 20°C-grown seedlings. In addition, LHCII1/LHCII3ratio increased from 3.8 in control (20°C) to 5.5 in 5°C-grown cotyledons. Ultrastructurally, 5°C-grown cotyledons had chloroplasts with swollen thylakoids as well as etiochloroplasts with distinct prolamellar bodies. Based on CO2-saturated O2evolution and in vivo Chl a fluorescence, cotyledons of 5°C jack pine exhibited an apparent photosynthetic efficiency that was 40% lower than 20°C controls. Seedlings grown at 5°C were photoinhibited more rapidly at 5°C and 1200 µmol·m2·s1than controls grown at 20°C, although the final extent of photoinhibition was similar. Exposure to high light at 5°C stimulated the xanthophyll cycle in cotyledons of both controls and 5°C-grown seedlings. In contrast to winter cereals, we conclude that growth of jack pine at 5°C impairs normal chloroplast biogenesis, which leads to an inhibition of photosynthetic efficiency.Key words: chloroplast, growth, temperature, photosynthesis, photoinhibition, Pinus banksiana Lamb., ultrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".