Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avant de franchir la ligne d’horizon (2012), le recueil Outre-mort. 1991-1994 (2003) et Lettre à ma sœur (2006) livrent des bribes de l’histoire des luttes démocratiques en Algérie. Les personnages de Habiba Djahnine relatent leurs espoirs mais aussi les échecs, les ratés, les impasses, les impossibilités, les amnésies, le découragement, l’être au bord de la folie auxquels ils ont été confrontés et auxquels ils font encore face. Le Bilan et perspectives que construit la documentariste est porté par le rôle dévolu à une « possible poésie » qui met en mots et en images les visages et les voix des diverses générations de ceux qui ont décidé d’agir au lieu de seulement subir, s’engageant dans «l’Algérie malgré tout».Avant de franchir la ligne d’horizon (2012), the poems in Outre-mort, 1991-1994 (2003) and Lettre à ma sœur (2006) provide pieces of the story of Algeria’s struggle for democracy. Habiba Djahnine’s characters share their hopes, but also their failures, losses, dead-ends, powerlessness, amnesias, despondencies, and the state of being on the brink of insanity that they have confronted and still must confront. The documentary film-maker’s assessment and perspectives are supported by the role given to a “possible poetry” which puts into words and pictures the faces and the voices of several generations of those who decided to act instead of simply suffer, committing themselves to “an Algeria in spite of it all”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".