MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128503364 · doi:10.1051/medsci/200319111093

Les récepteurs de la bradykinine : de nouveaux rôles physiopathologiques

2003· review· fr· W2128503364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2003
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyChemistryMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to being a pro-inflammatory mediator, bradykinin is now recognized as a neuromediator and regulator of several vascular and renal functions. New breakthroughs point to unusual and atypical signalling pathways for a G-protein coupled receptor that could explain the anti-proliferative and anti-fibrogenic effects of bradykinin. The availability of transgenic and knock out animal models for bradykinin receptors or bradykinin-synthesizing or -catabolic enzymes confirms these cardiac and renal protective roles for this peptide system. Bradykinin receptors are involved in the therapeutic action of angiotensin-1 converting enzyme inhibitors that are used in the treatment of arterial hypertension, heart failure and diabetes. Nevertheless, recent evidence highlights dissimilar mechanisms in the regulation and function of these receptors between the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Therefore, the development of more specific bradykinin receptor agonists or antagonists devoid of central actions seems to evolve as a new therapeutic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it