Neodymium isotopic composition of Ordovician conodonts as a seawater proxy: Testing paleogeography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate recent Ordovician paleogeographic reconstructions, ε Nd values were determined in conodonts as a proxy for the isotopic variations in ancient seawater using samples from the major cratons and microplates. Isotopic variations reveal the existence of distinct oceanic masses and epeiric seas that constrain the position of plates and terranes relative to these water masses and hence constrain models of regional and global paleogeography. The isotopic patterns show a consistent picture of the changes in the Ordovician oceans. The ε Nd values for water masses associated with Laurentia are strongly negative (−28 to −18) in the Early Ordovician, evolving over time to higher values in the range −13 to −5. The Early Ordovician signature of Laurentia is in marked contrast to other cratons and microplates, which have a range of values from −10 to −5. Samples from South China show interesting signals that reflect a greater similarity to Laurentia than other peri‐Gondwana terranes. The isotopic variations are a function of both regional geology and global tectonic processes, the most obvious being the Taconic Orogeny and onset of the closure of the Iapetus Ocean. Regional and global models of paleogeography are considered in light of these proxy signals. This study also reveals that conodonts are powerful geochemical tools for obtaining information on ancient water masses. The use of the Nd isotopic signatures from conodonts provides a method independent of paleomagnetism and biogeography to test paleogeographic models. By integrating such information, a more multidisciplinary approach is possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".