MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128566405 · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2006.887007

Distributed Simulation of Differential Algebraic Systems Using Optimal Sliding-Mode Control

2007· article· en· W2128566405 on OpenAlexaff
Farshad Rum, Brandon W. Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgebraic numberBandwidth (computing)Differential (mechanical device)Mathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)Optimal controlTime division multiple accessControl theory (sociology)Control (management)MathematicsEngineeringComputer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the optimal solution of differential algebraic equation (DAE) systems over a network of processors is investigated. A sliding-mode control (SMC) approach is used to enforce the algebraic constraints of the DAEs. Time delays associated with network communication give rise to a sliding-control problem with sensor time delays. A new approach is presented that decouples this problem into two independent problems. Using this property, a mixed Hinfinoptimization approach is applied to minimize errors. The results are applied to solve the problem of the optimal bandwidth allocation between the processors under the constraint of limited communication bandwidth. Experimental results for a distributed simulation application on a TDMA network demonstrate the validity of the approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207