MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128621253 · doi:10.1080/10652469.2010.535970

Some limit formulas for the Gamma and Psi (or Digamma) functions at their singularities

2011· article· en· W2128621253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegral Transforms and Special Functions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGravitational singularityMathematicsDigamma functionLimit (mathematics)Integer (computer science)Limit pointComplex planePure mathematicsGamma functionFunction (biology)Mathematical analysisCombinatoricsRiemann hypothesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both the Gamma function Γ(z) and the Psi (or Digamma) function ψ(z) are meromorphically continued to the whole complex z-plane with singularities (which are simple poles) at z=−k for non-positive integer values of k. Here, in this presentation, we derive the following (presumably new) limit formulas: for positive integer values of n and q, k being a non-negative integer. One of the above limit formulas is used here to partition the singularities of Γ(z) into the first set of singularities (at z=0,−1,−2,−3) and the second set of singularities (at z=−4,−5,−6, …). Some other closely-related formulas are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it