A Cacophony of Autochthony: Representing Indigeneity in Oaxacan Popular Mobilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN Este artículo examina la movilización popular y social en Oaxaca, México a través del ejemplo del movimiento de la Asamblea Popular de los Pueblos de Oaxaca (APPO). Estas páginas se centran en la manera en que el concepto de “indigeneidad” fue utilizado en representaciones e identificaciones de la APPO por diversos actores sociales. Un análisis más profunda de la actual movilización social en Oaxaca, ejemplificado por la APPO, sugiere que el uso de indigeneidad como etiqueta de identidad requiere una perspectivacrítica. Este trabajo argumenta que una dependencia aparente de modos de pensar dicotomizados (por ej., indígena/no‐indígena) nos limita a la hora de revelar los diálogos de identidad dentro de la APPO y otras formas actuales de movilización colectiva a gran escala en Latinoamérica. También obstaculiza el reconocimiento de la extensión y medios con los que las identidades generadas por movilizaciones aquí y más allá son constituidas por una sociedad civil más global (y virtual). This article examines popular social mobilization in Oaxaca, Mexico, through the example of the 2006 movement of the Asamblea Popular de los Pueblos de Oaxaca (APPO). It focuses on the way the concept of “indigeneity” came to be used in representations and identifications of the APPO by various social actors. A deeper examination of current social mobilization in Oaxaca as exemplified by the APPO suggests that the use of indigeneity as an identity label should be approached with a more sharply ground critical lens. This work argues that an apparent continued analytical reliance on modes of dichotomized thinking (e.g., indigenous/non‐indigenous) is limiting in terms of revealing the complicated interpellations of identity at play in the APPO and other current forms of large‐scale collective action in Latin America. It also prevents recognition of the extent and ways in which movement identities here and elsewhere are being constituted by an increasingly global (and virtual) civil society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".