MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128656413 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2010.2098474

Experimental Demonstration of Mixed-Polarization to Linearize Electro-Absorption Modulators in Radio-Over-Fiber Links

2010· article· en· W2128656413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarizerIntermodulationSpurious-free dynamic rangeRadio over fiberMaterials sciencePolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsPolarization-maintaining optical fiberLinearizationOptical fiberTransverse planeOptoelectronicsDynamic rangePhysicsAmplifierFiber optic sensorNonlinear systemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We experimentally investigate optical mixed polarization for the linearization of an electro-absorption modulator (EAM) in radio-over-fiber links. A linear polarizer is used before and after a polarization-dependent EAM. Thus, both transverse-electric and transverse-magnetic polarized lights are simultaneously modulated by different amounts. By carefully optimizing two polarization angles, the third-order intermodulation distortion (IMD3) is suppressed. The linearization leads to suppression of the IMD3 by more than 16 dB and improvement of spurious-free dynamic range by 8.1 and 9.5 dB for back-to-back and after 20 km of fiber transmission, respectively, compared to the nonlinearization case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it