MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128697759 · doi:10.1109/iwagpr.2011.5963900

Vertical soil moisture dynamics in the vadose zone: A high-resolution GPR reflection study

2011· article· en· W2128697759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVadose zoneGround-penetrating radarWater contentGeologyReflection (computer programming)MoistureSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesSoil waterGeotechnical engineeringMeteorologyRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a multi-year field study in which high-frequency 900 MHz reflection traveltime measurements were used to monitor vertical soil moisture distribution in the upper 3.0 m of vadose zone. GPR reflection profiles and common-midpoint (CMP) soundings were collected over the complete annual cycle of soil conditions characterized by numerous wetting, drying and freezing cycles typical of mid-latitude climates. The presence of four distinct stratigraphic reflection events at well-defined depths permitted quantitative assessment of seasonal moisture processes and their temporal dynamics during the study period. The incorporation of direct ground wave measurements from coincidently collected CMP soundings yielded improved resolution at the air-soil interface which facilitated characterization of the hydraulic coupling between shallow and deeper moisture conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207