MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128715851 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2035916

Robust Passivity Enforcement Scheme for Time-Domain Simulation of Multi-Conductor Transmission Lines and Cables

2009· article· en· W2128715851 on OpenAlexaff
H. M. Jeewantha De Silva, Ani Gole, John E. Nordstrom, L.M. Wedepohl

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityTransmission lineControl theory (sociology)Frequency domainElectric power transmissionConductorTime domainDiagonalEngineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an algorithm to enforce passivity on the time-domain simulation model for a multi-conductor cable or transmission line. The model is first reformulated in a form which reduces the severity of passivity violations. The frequency sweep method is then used to identify any remaining passivity violating regions of the model's frequency response. These small passivity violations are then removed using a linear constrained least squares algorithm to perturb the diagonal elements of propagation matrix. The passivity enforcement algorithm is applied to the Universal Line Model (ULM), a widely used robust phase domain formulation implemented in many commercial electromagnetic transients simulation programs. Two examples of multi-conductor underground cable systems, one for ac and the other for HVDC transmission are presented to demonstrate the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207