Femmes immigrantes et travail social : une recension des écrits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La clientèle des femmes immigrantes est relativement peu connue en service social. Cet article, amorce d'une recherche sur la pratique sociale auprès de ces femmes, constitue une recension d'une soixantaine d'écrits sur le sujet, en service social, psychologie, psychiatrie, sociologie, anthropologie, et parus au cours des dix dernières années. Il couvre les volets suivants : concepts théoriques de féminité et d'ethnicité et leur mise en relation ; travail salarié des femmes immigrantes : principales caractéristiques et mesures pouvant améliorer leur situation ; immigration et rôles sociaux, avec emphase sur le partage des tâches, les rapports de pouvoir dans la famille et la place du réseau de parenté ; santé des femmes immigrantes : leurs préoccupations, leurs expériences avec le système de soins, leurs attitudes vis-à-vis certains malaises, l'impact du choc culturel sur leur santé; le counseling interculturel : son développement et sa définition à partir des écrits en service social principalement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".