MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128733255 · doi:10.3852/mycologia.97.4.770

Measurement of a rugulosin-producing endophyte in white spruce seedlings

2005· article· en· W2128733255 on OpenAlexaff
Mark W. Sumarah, Jeffrey D. Miller, G. W. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueMycologia · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsJ. D. Irving (Canada)Carleton University
FundersResearch and Innovation Foundation
KeywordsBiologyEndophyteBotanyWhite (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies conducted in growth chambers had demonstrated the successful experimental inoculation of white spruce seedlings with anti-insectan toxin producing needle endophytes. Needles colonized with the rugulosin-producing endophyte 5WS22E1 (DAOM 229536) contained rugulosin in concentrations that impaired spruce budworm growth. Here we report experimental inoculations conducted under nursery conditions. To improve the reliability of detecting successful colonization, a polyclonal assay was developed for the target endophyte 5WS22E1. It was able to reliably detect the fungus in 500 ng subsamples of colonized needles. Seventeen months post-inoculation, 330 seedlings from 1235 inoculated were colonized. A random selection of 113 colonized seedlings was analyzed for rugulosin. Needles of most (90%) contained detectable concentrations of rugulosin. The range and distribution of the rugulosin concentrations was similar to that found in earlier tests done in growth chambers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMycologiaSame topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207