MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128733934 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2005.39

Parallel Computing for Sheet Metal Strain Analysis

2005· article· en· W2128733934 on OpenAlexafffund
H.-L. Chan, Allan D. Spence, M.P. Sklad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsBlankSheet metalGridMaterials scienceLaserOpticsSurface (topology)Coordinate-measuring machineLaser scanningGeometryComposite materialPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an application of high performance computing for industrial sheet metal strain analysis. A grid pattern of small circles is first electrochemically etched on the surface of a sheet metal blank. The blank is then formed into the desired shape. After forming, a laser digitizer scans on the surface of the sheet metal part and collects (X, Y, Z) coordinate points with the laser beam reflected intensity data. The scan resolution is 10,000 points per square centimetre. Using parallel data processing, each deformed circle is extracted, grouped and fitted. The strains are computed by comparing the fitting result to the original grid element dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Surface Polishing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207