Esthétique du Slam et de la poésie orale dans la région frontalière de Gatineau-Ottawa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur s’intéresse à l’évolution du mouvement de poésie slam dans la région de Gatineau-Ottawa. Il retrace l’évolution rapide de la performance slam depuis les premiers tournois aux États-Unis en 1975 jusqu’à la formation d’équipes compétitives à Montréal et dans l’ensemble des régions du Québec et de l’Ontario. En dépit des frontières géopolitiques et linguistiques qui délimitent les espaces urbains de Gatineau et d’Ottawa, les slameurs, tant franco-ontariens que québécois, circulent librement entre les différents lieux de diffusion. Il semble alors utile d’examiner le déploiement de la scène slam dans cette région exemplaire, où se produisent des poètes oraux de réputation internationale comme Marjolaine Beauchamp, Lise Careau, Pierre Cadieu et Mehdi Hamdad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".