MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128766429 · doi:10.1029/2003jb002892

Intense <i>PP</i> reflection beneath the aseismic forearc slope of the Japan Trench subduction zone and its implication of aseismic slip subduction

2005· article· en· W2128766429 on OpenAlexaff
Kimihiro Mochizuki, Mikako Nakamura, Junzo Kasahara, Ryota Hino, Minoru Nishino, Asako Kuwano, Yasuyuki Nakamura, Tomoaki Yamada, Masanao Shinohara, Toshinori Sato, Peyman P. Moghaddam, T. Kanazawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyForearcSeismologySubductionTrenchSlip (aerodynamics)Plate tectonicsSlabReflection (computer programming)Seismic waveGeophysicsTectonicsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strong anticorrelation between intensity of plate boundary PP reflection and seismicity had been revealed by a seismic reflection‐refraction survey conducted in 1996 in a seismic‐aseismic boundary region on the forearc slope of the Japan Trench. Amplitude of the strong reflection was explained by the presence of a thin layer (∼200 m) of low P wave velocity (3–4 km/s) at the top of the plate boundary. We conducted another seismic survey in 2001 in the same region as that of 1996 and verified the strong anticorrelation with planer extension along the plate boundary. Therefore existence of the thin layer of low P wave velocity along the plate boundary is expected within the aseismic regions. Extremely low P wave velocities along the plate interface at depths of around 10–20 km suggest that the layer may include fluid, clay minerals, and/or serpentine‐chlorite. Because these materials have low mechanical strength or cause low friction between the overriding and subducting plates, large strain may not be accumulated and aseismic slip may be dominant. As a result of the above speculation, the intense reflection observed within the aseismic regions may imply aseismic slip between the plates. Amplitude of the plate boundary PP reflection phase was found maximum about reflections from deeper plate interface, although the reflected waves propagate for longer distances. One possible explanation to this phenomenon is the presence of serpentinized wedge mantle material that is buoyancy‐driven to move along the top of the slab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207