Porous orthorhombic tungsten oxide thin films: synthesis, characterization, and application in electrochromic and photochromic devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porous orthorhombic tungsten oxide (o-WO3) thin films, stabilized by nanocrystalline anatase TiO2, are obtained by a sol–gel based two stage dip coating method and subsequent annealing at 600 °C. An Organically Modified Silicate (ORMOSIL) based templating strategy is adopted to achieve porosity. An asymmetric electrochromic device is constructed based on this porous o-WO3 layer. The intercalation/deintercalation of lithium ions into/from the o-WO3 layer of the device as a function of applied coloration/bleaching voltages have been studied. XRD measurements show systematic changes in the lattice parameters associated with structural phase transitions from o-WO3 to tetragonal LixWO3 (t-LixWO3) and a tendency to form cubic LixWO3 (c-LixWO3). These phase transitions, induced by the Li ions, are reversible, and the specific phase obtained depends on the quantity of intercalated/deintercalated Li. Raman spectroscopy data show the formation of t-LixWO3 for an applied potential of 1.0 V and the tendency of the system to transform to c-LixWO3 for higher coloration potentials. Optical measurements show excellent contrasts between colored and bleached states. An alternate photochromic device was constructed by sensitizing the o-WO3 layer with a ruthenium based dye. The nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 in the o-WO3 layer has led to an enhanced photochromic optical transmittance contrast of ∼51% in the near IR region. The combination of the photochromic and electrochromic properties of the synthesised o-WO3 layer stabilized by nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 opens up new vista for its application in energysaving smart windows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".