Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To add further support to the designation of hard gamma-rays, such as those emitted by (60)Co or (137)Cs, as the common reference radiation, as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group 37 in the recent ICRP Publication 92. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study examined the microdosimetric properties of seven commonly used reference radiations and quantified differences in radiation quality among them. The principal tool is the proximity function, which is derived from the spatial distributions of energy deposits calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The microdosimetric properties of the seven commonly used reference radiations were significantly different. However, there were no significant differences in the spectra of energy deposition in microscopic regions between hard gamma-rays over a wide range of distances of biological interest. CONCLUSIONS: From a microdosimetric point of view, gamma-rays from (60)Co or (137)Cs are the most suitable reference radiations for specification of the relative biological effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".