MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128799418 · doi:10.1080/00268970009483285

Molecule-doped rare gas clusters: structure and stability of Ar <i>n</i> NO( <i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> Π <sub>1/2/3/2</sub> ), <i>n</i> ≤ 25, from new <i>ab initio</i> potential energy surfaces of ArNO

2000· article· en· W2128799418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic physicsDissociation (chemistry)Ab initioAb initio quantum chemistry methodsCluster (spacecraft)ExcitationChemistryBond-dissociation energyPotential energy surfacePhysicsMoleculePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High level ab initio calculations carried out for the 2A′ and 2A″ states of ArNO(X 2Π) predict a crossing near the T-shape configuration, with the 2A′ minimum being slightly deeper. Spin-orbit coupling is included through a model treatment and results in two potential energy surfaces with similar topologies, nearly parallel to each other and close to the averaged non-relativistic surface. These results are used to construct a DIM-like model for Ar n NO clusters. The lowest energy cluster structures are found to resemble those for Ar n+1 with NO lying in the surface. The set of major magic numbers (structures of pronounced stability) is also the same as for the Ar n+1 clusters, and is emphasized further by the detachment of NO, which requires a larger energy than for detachment of a single Ar atom. The relations of the difference between the two dissociation energies and of the Ar n NO(1/2 → 3/2) excitation energy to the magic numbers are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it