MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128805480 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.106.058271

In Vitro Gamete Derivation from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Progress and Perspective1

2007· review· en· W2128805480 on OpenAlexaff
Makoto Nagano

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGameteGerm cellInduced pluripotent stem cellCell biologyStem cellPopulationImmunologyEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsSpermGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germ cells constitute a highly specialized cell population that is indispensable for the continuation and evolution of the species. Recently, several research groups have shown that these unique cells can be produced in vitro from pluripotent stem cells. Furthermore, live births of offspring using induced germ cells have been reported in one study. These results suggest that it may be possible to investigate germ cell development ex vivo and to establish novel reproductive technologies. To this end, it is critical to assess if gamete induction processes in vitro faithfully recapitulate normal germ cell development in vivo. Here, this issue is discussed with a focus on the germ line specification and the sex-specific development of pre- and postnatal germ cells. The aim of this paper is to concisely summarize the past progress and to present some future issues for the investigation into in vitro gamete production from pluripotent stem cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207