MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128878880 · doi:10.22456/1982-5269.17439

FEMINISMO ESTATAL SOB A PRESIDÊNCIA LULA: O CASO DA SECRETARIA DE POLÍTICAS PARA AS MULHERES

2010· article· pt· W2128878880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Debates · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O feminismo estatal prosperou sob a Presidência Lula? Este artigo analisa dois aspectos relativos à Secretaria de Políticas Públicas para Mulheres (SPM). Primeiro, o grau de comprometimento federal com essa agência. Segundo, o relacionamento da SPM com o movimento de mulheres. Utilizando-se de dados quantitativos longitudinais e de entrevistas em profundidade com femocratas e ativistas, este artigo indica que as Presidências Lula contribuíram para o fortalecimento institucional da SPM, dada a localização desta no aparelho de estado, seu status, e sua dotação orçamentária. Além disso, a composição interna da SPM, seus mecanismos de consulta e seu padrão de financiamento de projetos criaram uma dinâmica de cooperação (e não de cooptação ou captura) com o movimento de mulheres–algo visto como crucial ao êxito do feminismo de estado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it