FEMINISMO ESTATAL SOB A PRESIDÊNCIA LULA: O CASO DA SECRETARIA DE POLÍTICAS PARA AS MULHERES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O feminismo estatal prosperou sob a Presidência Lula? Este artigo analisa dois aspectos relativos à Secretaria de Políticas Públicas para Mulheres (SPM). Primeiro, o grau de comprometimento federal com essa agência. Segundo, o relacionamento da SPM com o movimento de mulheres. Utilizando-se de dados quantitativos longitudinais e de entrevistas em profundidade com femocratas e ativistas, este artigo indica que as Presidências Lula contribuíram para o fortalecimento institucional da SPM, dada a localização desta no aparelho de estado, seu status, e sua dotação orçamentária. Além disso, a composição interna da SPM, seus mecanismos de consulta e seu padrão de financiamento de projetos criaram uma dinâmica de cooperação (e não de cooptação ou captura) com o movimento de mulheres–algo visto como crucial ao êxito do feminismo de estado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".