Vulnerabilidade ao stresse em profissionais de emergência médica pré-hospitalar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research with pre-hospital medical emergency professionals in Portugal is still extremely reduced, even though this matter is better developed in countries such as the USA, Canada and Japan. Therefore, the characteristics inherent to this profession produce the interest to comprehend more thoroughly the vulnerability of these professionals to stress, which was the main objective of the present study. The sample was constituted by 161 medical emergency professionals distributed throughout the national territory; 42,2% of them possess the professional category of TAE/TAS, 31,7% are nurses, and 26,1% are physicians. We used the clusters sampling method, followed by the aleatoric sampling technique. The results indicate the existence of low global averages in vulnerability to stress. “Perfectionism and intolerance to frustration”, “Adverse life conditions”, “Dramatization of existence”, and “Deprivation of affects and rejection”, as well as to the totality of the stress assessment instrument. The subjects of the study that did not practice exercises
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it