MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128935920 · doi:10.1142/s0217979212420040

SOLUTION PROCESSED GRAPHENE THIN FILMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN ORGANIC SOLAR CELLS

2012· article· en· W2128935920 on OpenAlex
Reg Bauld, Faranak Sharifi, Giovanni Fanchini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneMaterials scienceOrganic solar cellThin filmTransmittanceElectrodeNanotechnologyHybrid solar cellOptoelectronicsPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a review of the recent progresses in solution processing graphene thin films and highlight some of the uses of graphene and graphene thin films in the construction of organic solar cells. We demonstrate a simple phenomenological model to describe the relationship between sheet conductivity and transmittance in graphene films with good agreement to all of the data found in the literature. We show that graphene thin films have been proven useful in the construction and improvement of organic solar cells not only as a replacement electrode, but also as an active acceptor material, or as a counter electrode when integrated into a conducting polymer matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it