MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128936700 · doi:10.1139/v02-204

The differing mechanisms of photo-formation of 7-cyanobenzocyclooctatetraene from 7- and 6-cyano-2,3-benzobicyclo[4.2.0]octa-2,4,7-triene

2003· article· en· W2128936700 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Christopher O. Bender, Douglas Dolman, Jeremy Christian Foesier, Sherry Lee Lawson, Kathryn E. Preuss

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCyclobutenePhotodissociationDeuteriumThermal decompositionPhotochemistryIrradiationBond cleavageMethaneCleavage (geology)EthyleneDecompositionMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisRing (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that 7-cyanobenzocyclooctatetraene (COT 2) is a product of the thermolysis and direct photolysis of 7- and 6-cyano-2,3-benzobicyclo[4.2.0]octa-2,4,7-triene (1 and 5), though the mechanisms of these rearrangements have not been reported. In the present study experiments have been carried out using the deuterium-labelled trienes 1a (93%-d1 at C-6) and 5a (93%-d1 at C-8), which were formed from 2π + 2π photo-closure (direct irradiation) of COT 2a labelled at C-8. The results reveal that whereas the thermolysis of 1a and 5a and the direct irradiation of 5a reform COT 2a, probably via cleavage of the strained cyclobutene C-1—C-6 bond, the direct irradiation of triene 1a gives a differently labelled COT product, containing the deuterium exclusively at C-9. The mechanism proposed for the latter phototransformation is a modification of the Zimmerman di-π-methane rearrangement.Key words: mechanisms, rearrangements, photochemistry, di-π-methane rearrangement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition ReactionsFrench-language works237,207