MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2128953494 · doi:10.7202/041593ar

« En entrant dans la Maison des Visions » : la Surmarionnette et ses modèles antiques

2010· article· fr· W2128953494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Didier Plassard

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une longue citation attribuée à Hérodote est intégrée par Craig dans son manifeste « L’acteur et la Surmarionnette ». Après avoir examiné les raisons qui conduisent à penser qu’il s’agit d’un faux, non seulement parce que l’original ne peut en être retrouvé mais aussi parce que la description qu’elle fait de la danse d’un semi-automate ne correspond à aucune donnée historique ou archéologique, cet article examine quelles étaient les informations dont disposait Craig concernant les spectacles de l’Ancienne Égypte. La description faite en 1904 par un archéologue d’un petit théâtre de marionnettes, retrouvé dans une tombe égyptienne d’époque romaine, est envisagée comme l’une des sources possibles du texte de Craig : en ce sens, le texte attribué à Hérodote pourrait être considéré comme la seule description qui nous reste du spectacle de la Surmarionnette rêvé par Craig, son renvoi dans un passé très ancien (800 avant J.-C., selon Craig) ayant pour fonction de montrer que le théâtre est né de la danse, et non des poètes tragiques grecs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.028
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales→Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→