MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128968629 · doi:10.1109/icbn.2005.1589659

QoS provisioning via admission control in cellular/wireless LAN interworking

2005· article· en· W2128968629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceAdmission controlQuality of serviceWireless networkProvisioningWirelessWireless WANCellular networkOverlayOverlay networkCall Admission ControlWi-Fi arrayDistributed computingTelecommunicationsThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is widely recognized that the next-generation wireless networks will integrate heterogeneous wireless technologies. The complementary characteristics of cellular networks and wireless local area networks (WLANs) make the interworking a promising trend. Admission control is one of the essential mechanisms to enhance QoS provisioning in a cellular/WLAN integrated network and utilize the overall resources efficiently. In this paper, we propose an effective admission control scheme for both voice and data services. The admission region is derived, taking into account the two-tier overlay structure, non-uniform traffic distribution and user mobility in the integrated network. The impact of traffic and mobility parameters on the admission scheme is evaluated, which provides some insights for further extension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207