Two new high-nuclearity copper(II) chloride oligomers with herringbone stacking patterns synthesized by in situ templation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of trichloroiminophosphoranes Cl3P=NR to control the concurrent release of the templating cation [RNH3]+ and chloride ligand via in situ PN and PCl bond cleavage produced two new copper(II) chloride oligomers. The nature of the organic substituent R was a factor in determining the chain lengths. For n-propyltrichloroiminophosphorane, the hexanuclear cluster [n-PrNH3]2[Cu6Cl14] (1) was obtained, while p-tolyltrichloroiminophosphorane generated the tetranuclear copper chloride salt [4-CH3C6H4NH3][2-Cl-4-CH3C6H3NH3][Cu4Cl10] (2). In both structures a two-dimensional framework displaying a herringbone arrangement is created by CuCl secondary bonding interactions. The direct addition of the [n-PrNH3]+ cation to a CuCl2·2H2O solution under the same reaction conditions produced [n-PrNH3]2[CuCl4]. Key words: copper halides, templation, oligomers, two-dimensional frameworks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".