MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129011202 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2008.2010722

A Compact Transmission-Line Metamaterial Antenna With Extended Bandwidth

2008· article· en· W2129011202 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiang Zhu, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsWidebandMetamaterialPhysicsTransmission lineLambdaMicrostripBandwidth (computing)Spiral antennaElectric power transmissionMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaPlanarTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringOpticsAntenna (radio)Computer scienceTelecommunicationsCoaxial antennaEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wideband and compact planar antenna is proposed using a doubly resonant transmission-line metamaterial (TL-MTM) structure. The antenna consists of two TL-MTM arms that resonate at different frequencies. Each arm comprises a microstrip transmission-line loaded with five spiral inductors and is well matched to 50 Omega through an embedded series meandered line. Each arm is designed to work as a single antenna at its own resonant frequency, determined by the loading spiral inductance, where a zero insertion phase occurs. A wideband antenna matching is enabled when these two resonances suitably merge together. A fabricated prototype has dimensions of lambdao/4 times lambdao/7 times lambdao/29, yielding a vertical linear electric field polarization, and provides a 100-MHz bandwidth (-10 dB) with a measured radiation efficiency of 65.8% at 3.30 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations218
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207