MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129012967 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790505

Lag phase model for transient growth of pseudomonas putida on phenol

2001· article· en· W2129012967 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Alireza Tarighian, Gordon Hill, Yen‐Han Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPseudomonas putidaTransient (computer programming)LagBioreactorBiological systemSteady state (chemistry)PhenolPhase (matter)Substrate (aquarium)Work (physics)Continuous modellingComputer scienceThermodynamicsChemistryMathematicsPhysicsPhysical chemistryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The successful design of large‐scale bioreactors requires the ability to predict both steady‐state and dynamic operating conditions. At the same time, mathematical models should not be too complex in order to reduce experimental work required to determine kinetic parameters. A simple model which predicts the behaviour of batch and transient continuous culture operations is presented and experimentally verified. The model is based on two regions of metabolic activity: the lag phase and the active phase. Pseudomonas putida growing on phenol as a substrate in a well‐mixed bioreactor was tested in three modes of operation: batch, continuous start‐up and continuous step‐change. The model is demonstrated to predict all the qualitative aspects of the dynamic phases of growth and is quantitatively accurate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207