MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129078799 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2005.1517009

Transient electromagnetic modeling using recurrent neural networks

2005· article· en· W2129078799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Recurrent neural networkComputer scienceArtificial neural networkComputational electromagneticsTime domainElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectromagnetic fieldPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel technique for modeling the behaviour of two port passive electromagnetic (EM) structures with respect to geometrical and material parameters is introduced. A direct time domain (TD) formulation is proposed that utilizes transient responses of the structure to applied excitation signals as training data for recurrent neural networks (RNN). These EM responses are obtainable from TD EM simulators. Once trained, the RNN macromodel can be inserted into circuit simulators for use in circuit analysis. The RNN macromodel is demonstrated with two examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it