MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129087045 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2006.876109

Diagnosis of logic circuits using compressed deterministic data and on-chip response comparison

2006· article· en· W2129087045 on OpenAlex
Adam B. Kinsman, S. Ollivierre, Nicola Nicolici

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChipTest compressionComputer scienceAutomatic test pattern generationProcess (computing)Design for testingSystem on a chipLogic gateLogic familyComputer engineeringElectronic circuitEmbedded systemComputer hardwareLogic synthesisAlgorithmReliability engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While manufacturing test helps to isolate faulty devices from the good ones, diagnosis is enabling a faster transition from the yield learning to the volume production phase of a new process technology. Given the escalating design complexity, new methods such as embedded deterministic test have been proposed in recent years to deal with the cost of manufacturing test. This paper discusses diagnosis of logic blocks by leveraging the existing embedded deterministic test hardware. The proposed method is based on new techniques for on-chip decompression and comparison of incompletely specified test patterns and test responses. Using experimental data, the tradeoffs between the number of tester channels, on-chip area, and scan time are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it