MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129095921 · doi:10.3749/canmin.46.4.753

CARBONATITES FROM A LAMPROPHYRIC DYKE-SWARM, SOUTH WESTLAND, NEW ZEALAND

2008· article· en· W2129095921 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alan F. Cooper, Lorraine A. Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonatiteGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A late Oligocene – early Miocene alkali lamprophyre dyke swarm was emplaced in western South Island, New Zealand, during transtensional development of the Alpine Fault plate boundary. Intrusive rocks comprise ultramafic and feldspathic lamprophyres, tinguaites, trachytes and carbonatites, the evolved members of which cause intense local fenitization of the country rock, producing aegirine–riebeckite schists. Carbonatites show a wide range of compositions from calcite- through dolomite–ankerite- to siderite- and norsethite-rich varieties. Carbonates and phosphocarbonates of Sr, Ca–Sr, Ca–Ba and REE occur in accessory amounts. Ratios of Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopes and nodule petrology indicate magma derivation from a previously metasomatized source in a part of the mantle dominated by the FOZO component. Very restricted ranges in radiogenic and stable isotope values indicate that all members of the swarm are cogenetic. Efficient fractional crystallization of a camptonite-producing magma yields a phonolitic or tinguaitic residuum that then separates immiscibly to form carbonatitic magma. Not all carbonatites are derived from a single lineage, so immiscibility may operate repeatedly during late fractionation. The final stages of carbonatite evolution (<400°C) are dominated by carbothermal processes, during which the carbonatites and associated silicate rocks develop a LREE-depleted, MREE-enriched pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207