MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129096803 · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr308

Altered palmitoylation and neuropathological deficits in mice lacking HIP14

2011· article· en· W2129096803 on OpenAlexafffund
Roshni R. Singaraja, Kun Huang, Sue S. Sanders, Austen J. Milnerwood, Rochelle M. Hines, Jason P. Lerch, Sonia Franciosi, Renaldo C. Drisdel, Kahini A. Vaid, Fiona B. Young, C. Doty, Junmei Wan, Nagat Bissada, R. Mark Henkelman, W. N. Green, N. G. Davis, Lynn A. Raymond, Michael R. Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaChild and Family Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHuntingtinPalmitoylationBiologyMutantHuntingtin ProteinHuntington's diseaseCell biologyNeuroscienceGeneGeneticsInternal medicineBiochemistryDiseaseEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Huntingtin interacting protein 14 (HIP14, ZDHHC17) is a huntingtin (HTT) interacting protein with palmitoyl transferase activity. In order to interrogate the function of Hip14, we generated mice with disruption in their Hip14 gene. Hip14-/- mice displayed behavioral, biochemical and neuropathological defects that are reminiscent of Huntington disease (HD). Palmitoylation of other HIP14 substrates, but not Htt, was reduced in the Hip14-/- mice. Hip14 is dysfunctional in the presence of mutant htt in the YAC128 mouse model of HD, suggesting that altered palmitoylation mediated by HIP14 may contribute to HD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207