MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129103629 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2007.913360

A Compact Highly Reconfigurable CMOS MMIC Directional Coupler

2008· article· en· W2129103629 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed A. Y. Abdalla, Khoman Phang, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanada Research ChairsEuropean Space AgencyCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMonolithic microwave integrated circuitHybrid couplerElectrical engineeringPower dividers and directional couplersCMOSRat-race couplerVoltageEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a tunable CMOS directional coupler that utilizes lumped-element L-C sections. The lumped-element approach used to build the directional coupler makes it possible to integrate the coupler onto a single monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC), as it occupies a small area compared to printed designs. The directional coupler uses varactors and tunable active inductors (TAIs) to synthesize the series and shunt reactances, respectively, which allows extensive electronic control over the coupling coefficient, while insuring a low return loss and a very high isolation. Furthermore, using varactors and TAIs allows the directional coupler to be reconfigured for operation over a wide range of frequencies. Moreover, the symmetric configuration of the coupler allows it to switch from forward to backward operation by simply exchanging the bias voltages applied across the series varactors. The MMIC coupler was fabricated in a standard 0.13-mum CMOS process and operates from a 1.5-V supply. The circuit occupies 730 mum times 600 mum, and is capable of achieving tunable coupling coefficients from 1.4 to 7.1 dB, while maintaining an isolation higher than 41 dB. The MMIC coupler is also capable of operating at any center frequency over the 2.1-3.1-GHz frequency range with higher than 40-dB isolation. The coupler achieves a -4.1-dBm 1-dB compression point while operating from a 1.5-V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207