Vagal afferent activity and body temperature in 3 to 10-day-old and adult rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the possible contribution of vagal stretch receptor activity to the increased power of the Hering-Breuer reflex in hyperthermia in rats during the early postnatal period. Experiments were performed on 10 anesthetized (pentobarbital 40 mg/kg, i.p.) 3 to 10-day-old (body weight of 16 +/- 1 g; SE) and, for comparison, 18 adult Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight of 336 +/- 35 g). Animals were tracheostomized and artificially ventilated with oxygen. The left vagus nerve was cut. In adult animals, single receptor fibers or a bundle of a few fibers were recorded using a bipolar stainless-steel electrode under mineral oil. In the young rats, a suction electrode filled with normal saline was used. Positive pressure of either 5 or 10 cmH2O was applied to the trachea when the respirator was turned off. The vagal activity was amplified and monitored on a storage oscilloscope for calculation of the frequency of vagal afferent activity during a given pressure application at different rectal temperatures (T(R); range 28 to 42 degrees C). In total, 30 and 31 sets of vagal activity in the young and adult rats, respectively, were analyzed. In all cases, an increase in tracheal pressure (P(TR)) from 5 to 10 cmH2O increased the frequency of vagal firing. The increase was greater in the adult versus the young animals; at 36 degrees C the increase was 49 +/- 11% and 16 +/- 3% in the adult and young rats, respectively (P < 0.01). In all animals, vagal receptors showed temperature-sensitivity, but less so in the young than in the adult rats (P < 0.0004 and P < 0.003; for P(TR) of 5 and 10 cmH2O, respectively). In addition, the relationship between temperature-sensitivity and T(R) had significant slopes (P < 0.001 for both inflation pressures) in the adults but not in the young rats, indicating that in the latter the temperature-sensitivity of vagal receptors is independent of TR. These results imply that temperature-sensitivity of vagal receptors could have contributed to the increased power of the Hering-Breuer reflex in rats during the early postnatal period in the warmer environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".