MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129134754 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0549

(<i>A</i> = 10)-Accompanied spontaneous ternary fission of californium isotopes

2013· article· en· W2129134754 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Ismail, W. M. Seif, A. Y. Ellithi, A. S. Hashem

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsFissionCluster decayNuclear physicsAsymmetryOpen shellAtomic physicsIsotopeTernary operationCaliforniumMass numberCold fissionNeutronNeutron emissionParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ternary fission of 238–256Cf even-A isotopes is studied in the framework of the three-cluster model within the spherical approximation. The study is confined to those decays in which the accompanied light charged particle is of mass A = 10. The most probable ternary fission path is obtained as the one that has a peak in the Q-value and a minimum in the driving potential, with respect to the mass and charge asymmetries. Assuming both equatorial and collinear configurations of the different emissions of the light charged particles with A = 10, the ternary fission of 252Cf is found to be most favored with 10Be. The predicted favorable fragmentation channels of the 10Be-accompanied ternary fission of 238–256Cf, even-A, isotopes are discussed in detail. The closed-shell structure of the produced heaviest fragment is found to play a key role for the detected most favorable channels. A nucleus with a closed neutron shell or even doubly closed shell always appears as the heaviest nucleus in the favored channel of the ternary fission of all mentioned isotopes. As the isospin asymmetry of the isotope increases, the width of its cold fission valley around the symmetric mass region decreases, with more shifting towards the centre of the symmetric region. Neither the most favorable ternary emissions nor the behavior of the ternary fragmentation potential changed with the type of nuclear interaction potential (Yukawa, folding potential with Migdal force, and proximity 77). Also, almost no change is observed according to the method of emission of the fragments (equatorially or collinearly) or when the calculations are performed without inserting the nuclear interaction potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207