MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129139397 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1465740

A New Homomorphic Bayesian Wavelet-Based MMAE Filter for Despeckling SAR Images

2005· article· en· W2129139397 on OpenAlexaff
M. I. H. Bhuiyan, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeckle patternSpeckle noiseArtificial intelligenceWaveletSynthetic aperture radarCauchy distributionComputer scienceComputer visionGaussian noisePattern recognition (psychology)Filter (signal processing)Additive white Gaussian noiseMathematicsEstimatorNoise (video)AlgorithmWhite noiseImage (mathematics)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce a new homomorphic Bayesian wavelet-based minimum mean absolute error filter for despeckling synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. The wavelet coefficients of the logarithmically transformed reflectance image and the speckle noise image are modeled using a Cauchy prior and an additive white Gaussian noise distribution, respectively. These models are then exploited to develop a Bayesian minimum mean absolute error estimator. A method is presented for estimating the dispersion parameter of the assumed Cauchy prior. Experiments are carried out on a typical noise-free image corrupted with synthetic speckle noise and a real SAR image, and the results show that the proposed method has a performance that is superior to that of the other existing methods in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio, ability to suppress the speckle in the homogeneous regions and the visual quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207