Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The notion of evolvability has been put forward to describe the "core mechanism" of natural and artificial evolution. Recently, studies have revealed the influence of the environment upon a system's evolvability. In this contribution, we study the evolvability of a system in various environmental situations. We consider neutrality and variability as two sides of evolvability. The former makes a system tolerant to mutations and provides a hidden staging ground for future phenotypic changes. The latter produces explorative variations yielding phenotypic improvements. Which of the two dominates is influenced by the environment. We adopt two tools for this study of evolvability: 1) the rate of adaptive evolution, which captures the observable adaptive variations driven by evolvability; and 2) the variability of individuals, which measures the potential of an individual to vary functionally. We apply these tools to a Linear Genetic Programming system and observe that evolvability is able to exploit its two sides in different environmental situations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it