MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129150824 · doi:10.2528/pierm13080610

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FOR MICROWAVE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING BASED ON FDTD AND GA

2013· article· en· W2129150824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress In Electromagnetics Research M · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilkes University
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodMicrowave imagingMicrowaveTomographyMaterials scienceOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors recently presented a novel microwave tomog- raphy method for creating quantitative images of the electromagnetic properties of the interior of unknown objects (1). This method is based on a time-domain inverse solver which uses the multi-illumination tech- nique and includes the dispersive and heterogeneous characteristic of the object. The Frequency Dependent Finite Difierence Time Domain ((FD) 2 TD) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) technique were utilized for determining unknown characteristics of the object. In the present pa- per, the calibration of measured data are described and image recon- struction results for preliminary experiments performed at the Uni- versity of Manitoba's Microwave Tomography Laboratory and at the Institut Frsenel are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it