MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129165433 · doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2008.07.005

Societal Change and OR Nursing in the Pages of the <i>AORN Journal</i>, 1963 to 1983

2008· review· en· W2129165433 on OpenAlex
Alice Moszczynski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAORN Journal · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsMills Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyNursingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decades of the 1960s and 1970s were unlike any US society had previously experienced. The order of society was openly challenged, which resulted in diverse viewpoints about what was acceptable behavior and thinking. The effects of scientific discoveries were evident in health care, and demands for options in care influenced the delivery of health services. Many of these influences were felt by nurses in the OR, and OR nursing itself transformed in response to the changes in society. The AORN Journal is used in this article as a source of information to ascertain how changes in society were reflected in OR nursing during the period from 1963 to 1983.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.342
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.014 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it