MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129239821 · doi:10.1111/ijfs.12365

Cultivable bacterial diversity and amylase production in three typical <scp>D</scp>aqus of <scp>C</scp>hinese spirits

2013· article· en· W2129239821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaKey Technologies Research and Development Program
KeywordsAmylaseBacteriaBacillus amyloliquefaciensCereusBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisBrewingFood scienceBiologyMicrobiologyChemistryEnzymeBacillus cereusBiochemistryFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Both culture‐dependent method and molecular technique were firstly used to simultaneously investigate the cultivable bacterial diversity and amylase production in three typical D aqus of C hinese spirits. The results showed that both cultivable bacterial diversity and amylase production were obviously different. The species of nine bacteria from D eshan, nine from B aisha and six from W uling D aqus were identified. The total bacterial strains of 17, 15 and 14, and 9, 16 and 10 could produce α‐amylase and glucoamylase, respectively, from the D aqus, and the enzyme yields were different. B acillus licheniformis , B acillus subtilis and B acillus amyloliquefaciens not only were dominant bacteria in the D aqus, but also possessed high activities of α‐amylase and glucoamylase. By comparison, B acillus cereus and B acillus oleronius were found to be another predominant bacterial species and good producers of α‐amylase and glucoamylase in D eshan and W uling D aqus, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it