MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129244731 · doi:10.1109/pes.2011.6039426

Sub-synchronous control interactions between type 3 wind turbines and series compensated AC transmission systems

2011· article· en· W2129244731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsElectrovaya (Canada)
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsTurbineWind powerController (irrigation)ConvertersElectric power transmissionElectric power systemTransmission systemControl engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Control systemEngineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringAerospace engineeringPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent project experience and studies have shown that Type 3 wind turbine generators with power electronic converters and controls that operate near series compensated transmission lines are susceptible to un-damped sub-synchronous oscillations. This paper presents an overview of the Sub-Synchronous Control Interaction (SSCI) phenomenon. Simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC using a Type 3 wind turbine model are used to demonstrate SSCI, and the design of an SSCI damping controller is presented to help mitigate the problem. Recommendations are provided to wind turbine manufacturers, generation developers, and system planners to appropriately predict and mitigate SSCI concerns before they severely impact project and system development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations227
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207