Mechanisms for tolerance to diatomaceous earth between strains of <i>Tribolium castaneum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fourteen strains of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) had mortalities ranging from 5 to 100% when exposed to diatomaceous earth at 600 ppm for seven days. The most tolerant strain had a lethal dose for 50% of the population (LD50) of 413 ppm and the most susceptible strain had a LD50 of 238 ppm. Adults of the tolerant strain were lighter (2.0 mg) than the susceptible strain (2.6 mg). Tolerant adults lost water at lower rate (6 μg h−1 than susceptible adults (12 μg h−1), when held in wheat treated with 600 ppm diatomaceous earth for 24 h, than held at 5% r.h. with no food. Tolerant adults that were not exposed to diatomaceous earth lost water at a lower rate (3 μg h−1) than susceptible adults (5 μg h−1). Both strains, exposed and not exposed to diatomaceous earth died when their water content was between 33 and 37% of their total weight. Insects taken directly from the cultures had 52% (tolerant) and 53% (susceptible) of their total weight as water. Tolerant adults moved slower through grain and across filter paper than susceptible adults. Tolerant adults avoided wheat treated with diatomaceous earth at concentrations as low as 75 ppm, whereas the adults from the susceptible strain did not avoid diatomaceous earth, even at 600 ppm. The consequences of a strain tolerant to diatomaceous earth is discussed with respect to the use of diatomaceous earth to control stored‐product insect infestations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".