MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129256398 · doi:10.4000/clio.11991

Sandra Boehringer & Violaine Sebillotte Cuchet (dir.), « Des femmes en action. L’individu et la fonction en Grèce antique »,

2014· article· fr· W2129256398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lydie Bodiou

Bibliographic record

VenueClio · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiqueHumanitiesPhilosophyArtAction (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage est le premier hors-série de la revue Métis. Le numéro réunit douze contributions issues d’un séminaire de recherche qui s’est tenu à l’automne 2011 à Épineuil. L’introduction de Sandra Boehringer avec la collaboration de Violaine Sebillotte-Cuchet retrace deux décennies (1992-2012) de réflexions menées autour et par la revue Métis sur les rapports sociaux de sexes, la question de la différence des sexes, l’histoire des femmes jusqu’au questionnement actuel sur le genre. Ce regard...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClioSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207