MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129262067 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2004.235.01.15

Geometry and origin of dolomudstone reservoirs: Pekisko Formation (Lower Carboniferous), western Canada

2004· article· en· W2129262067 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. C. F. Hopkins

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboniferousGeologyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dolomudstones of the Pekisko Formation in western Canada form small but important oil and gas reservoirs. The reservoirs are irregularly shaped bodies 1 km or so wide and commonly 5–8 m thick. Porosity development within the dolomudstones is a complex function of sedimentation, early facies-selective dolomitization and later telogenetic leaching of calcareous components. The carbonate sediment precursor of the dolomudstone, interpreted from relict textures preserved in chert nodules, was a microwackestone with abundant silt-sized skeletal fragments. Dolomudstone reservoirs are comprised of dolomudstones, calcareous dolomudstones, and subordinate interbedded dolowackestones and dolograinstones. Some dolomudstone reservoirs are contained entirely within grainstones. Others are capped by tight fenestral lime mudstone that has been dolomitized locally. Dolomitization has been most intense within the centres of these reservoirs, and dolomudstones grade laterally into calcareous dolomudstones. The association of facies indicates that microwackestones were deposited in subtidal intershoal and lagoonal environments on an inner ramp. Grainstone shoals provided a broad barrier that absorbed wave energy seaward of the lagoon. Fenestral lime mudstones accumulated in peritidal environments in restricted areas of the inner ramp, landward of the lagoon. Dolomitization is interpreted to have been early and selective to the microwackestone facies because it retained permeability or was reactive during early burial. Dolomitizing fluids were most probably derived from overlying formations and made their way downwards through spatially separated conduits. The Pekisko Formation was exposed and sculptured at several Jurassic-Early Cretaceous unconformities. During these times, sandstones and shales were deposited in solution cavities developed within the dolomudstones. Concomitant leaching of calcite increased porosity of the dolomudstone reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207