Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The paper considers the virtualization of sovereignty today in the context of the Arctic debates. These are debates in which various parties, including the Government of Canada, First Nations groups, Inuit, international organizations, scholars, policy-makers and others, use the term sovereignty in diverse and at times divisive ways. We investigate several of the epistemological and ontological stakes of these discussions. We draw attention to the ways in which sovereignty as an abstract concept is actualized in the course of social and political disputes in the North in the twenty-first century. Keywords: Aboriginalracial ideologypowerpoliticssecularismtheory Notes 1. The phrase 'neo-Weberian moment' is developed further in Milbank (Citation2008) in which he conducts a precipitous reading of Walter Benjamin's essay 'Capitalism as Religion' against the background of Weber's work on the state. 2. Agnew in Geopolitics: Revisioning World Politics (Citation1998) attempts something similar, especially in his aim to use visual metaphors such as imagination to 'show how political geography incorporated the dominant geopolitical imagination from the European-American experience that was then projected onto the rest of the world and into the future' (p. 1). 3. Incidentally, žižek uses this point to criticize 'risk society' social theorists, such as Ulrich Beck and Anthony Giddens, whose work is open to the dialectical supplement that points out today that 'racism itself is becoming reflexive'. The Balkans becomes the exceptional space in which the multiculturalists critic can express and project 'his/her repressed racism' (p. 6). 4. See Steinberg (Citation1999 ,Citation2001).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it