Is tonic sympathetic vasoconstriction increased in the skeletal muscle vasculature of aged canines?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that tonic adrenergic and nonadrenergic receptor-mediated sympathetic vasoconstriction would increase at rest and during exercise with advancing age. Young (n = 6; 22 ± 1 mo; means ± SE) and old (n = 6; 118 ± 9 mo) beagles were studied. Selective antagonists for alpha-1, alpha-2, neuropeptide Y (NPY), and purinergic (P(2x)) receptors were infused at rest and during treadmill running at 2.5 mph and 4 mph with 2.5% grade. Prazosin produced similar increases in vascular conductance in young and old beagles at rest (Young: 158 ± 34%; Old: 98 ± 19%) and during exercise at 2.5 mph (Young: 80 ± 10%; Old: 58 ± 12%) and 4 mph and 2.5% grade (Young: 57 ± 5%; Old: 26 ± 4%). Rauwolscine caused similar (P > 0.05) increases in vascular conductance in old compared with young dogs at rest (Young: 119 ± 25%; Old: 64 ± 22%) and at 2.5 mph (Young: 86 ± 13%; Old: 60 ± 7%) and 4 mph with 2.5% grade (Young: 61 ± 5%; Old: 43 ± 7%). N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-d-arginine amide (BIBP) caused a smaller increase (P < 0.05) in vascular conductance in old compared with young dogs at rest (Young: 179 ± 44%; Old: 91 ± 22%), whereas similar increases (P > 0.05) of experimental limb vascular conductance in young and old dogs occurred following BIBP during exercise at 2.5 mph (Young: 56 ± 16%; Old: 50 ± 12%) and 4 mph and 2.5% grade (Young: 45 ± 10%; Old: 25 ± 7%). Pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2'-4'-disulfonic acid infusion produced a larger increase in vascular conductance in old compared with young beagles at rest (Young: 88 ± 14%; Old: 191 ± 58%), whereas similar increases were observed at 2.5 mph (Young: 47 ± 18%; Old: 31 ± 11%) and 4 mph with 2.5% grade (Young: 26 ± 13%; Old: -18 ± 8%). At rest, NPY receptor-mediated restraint of skeletal muscle blood flow was reduced with advancing age, whereas P(2x) receptor-mediated restraint of skeletal muscle blood flow was increased. During exercise, the magnitude of adrenergic and nonadrenergic sympathetic vasoconstriction was not different between young and old dogs. Overall, these data demonstrate that adrenergic receptor-mediated vasoconstriction was not elevated at rest, but nonadrenergic sympathetic vasoconstriction was altered under basal conditions in aged beagles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".