MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129318746 · doi:10.2113/51.2.91

Stratigraphy and palynology of the Cretaceous Colorado Group and Lea Park Formation at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada

2003· article· en· W2129318746 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R. P. W. Stancliffe

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratigraphyGeologyCretaceousGeological surveyPalynologyCitationLibrary scienceArchaeologyPaleontologyHistoryPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| June 01, 2003 Stratigraphy and palynology of the Cretaceous Colorado Group and Lea Park Formation at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada R.P.W. Stancliffe; R.P.W. Stancliffe Imperial Oil Resources, 237 - 4th Avenue SW, Calgary, AB T2P 3M9, stan.stancliffe@esso.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David J. McIntyre David J. McIntyre Manuka Palynologic Consulting, 3503 Underhill Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4E9, david.j.mcintyre@shaw.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information R.P.W. Stancliffe Imperial Oil Resources, 237 - 4th Avenue SW, Calgary, AB T2P 3M9, stan.stancliffe@esso.ca David J. McIntyre Manuka Palynologic Consulting, 3503 Underhill Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4E9, david.j.mcintyre@shaw.ca Publisher: Canadian Energy Geoscience Association Received: 18 Feb 2002 Accepted: 08 Jan 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2003) 51 (2): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.2113/51.2.91 Article history Received: 18 Feb 2002 Accepted: 08 Jan 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation R.P.W. Stancliffe, David J. McIntyre; Stratigraphy and palynology of the Cretaceous Colorado Group and Lea Park Formation at Cold Lake, Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2003;; 51 (2): 91–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/51.2.91 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract Stratigraphic research of the Colorado Group at Cold Lake, Alberta, has generally been assumed to be of secondary importance to that of the underlying Grand Rapids and Clearwater formations and of their significant volumes of bitumen. However, recent oil field development has required the geomechanical testing of the overlying shales. Using palynology, it has been found that the age of the group ranges from the late middle Albian to Santonian/Campanian and that the uppermost shales are part of the Lea Park Formation. Within the Colorado Group, six formations and an undefined unit can be resolved on logs and, in part, with palynomorphs. The basal contact of the overlying Lea Park Formation can be defined using logs but not the top because the overlying log signatures of the Cenozoic tills are very similar. There are areas within the Cold Lake region that contain evidence of post-Cretaceous erosion of the Lea Park Formation and the top two units of the Colorado Group, but this erosion and subsequent glaciogenic thrusting does not affect lower stratigraphic intervals in the study area. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207