Cell wall degradation and modification during programmed cell death in lace plant, <i>Aponogeton madagascariensis</i> (Aponogetonaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An unusual form of leaf morphogenesis occurs in the aquatic, lace plant, Aponogeton madagascariensis (Aponogetonaceae). Early in development, discrete patches of cells undergo programmed cell death (PCD) and form perforations during leaf expansion. In addition to the protoplasts, walls of the dying cells are degraded during PCD. The cuticle of the perforation site is eroded first, followed by dissolution of cell wall matrix components, so that walls appear as loose fibrillar networks as perforations form. Gel diffusion assays of wall-degrading enzyme activity indicated that pectinases are active throughout leaf development, while cellulase activity was restricted to early stages of perforation formation. Alcian blue staining showed that degrading walls remain rich in pectin, and immunolocalization of pectin epitopes indicated that the proportions of esterified and de-esterifed pectins do not change significantly. Walls of perforation border cells are modified by suberin deposition late in development, and reactive oxygen species, thought to have a role in polymerization of phenolic suberin monomers, are present at the same stage. This timing suggests that suberization may limit the spread of PCD and provide an apoplastic barrier against microbial invasion but does not initiate PCD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".