MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129327856 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2001.956329

Supporting advance reservations in wavelength-routed WDM networks

2002· article· en· W2129327856 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservationComputer scienceRouting and wavelength assignmentComputer networkWavelength-division multiplexingResource allocationDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Resource (disambiguation)Focus (optics)Wavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advance reservation is a useful network service that can not only provide guaranteed services for network users but also allow networks to better plan their resource allocations. This paper studies advance reservation for wavelength-routed WDM networks. The focus is primarily on effective routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) solutions to supporting different types of advance reservations as well as the coexistence of both advance and immediate reservations. The paper briefly reviews related work in advance reservation, presents the potential advance reservation problems, and defines an advance reservation model for wavelength-routed WDM networks. Based on this reservation model, we develop effective RWA solutions to supporting different types of advance reservations. We also propose and discuss effective control mechanisms for supporting the coexistence of both advance and immediate reservations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207