Chilean high‐altitude hot‐spring sinters: a model system for UV screening mechanisms by early Precambrian cyanobacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Before the build‐up of stratospheric ozone, Archean and early Proterozoic phototrophs existed in an environment subjected to highly elevated levels of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Therefore, phototrophic life would have required a protective habitat that balanced UV attenuation and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) transmission. Here we report on aspects of the phototroph geomicrobiology of El Tatio geothermal field, located at 4300 m in the Andes Mountains of northern Chile (22 °S), as an analogue system to early Precambrian environments. El Tatio microbes survive in a geochemical environment of rapidly precipitating amorphous silica (sinter) and unusually high solar radiation (including elevated UV‐B flux) due to the high‐altitude, low‐latitude location. Cyanobacteria produce 10‐mm‐thick surface mats containing filaments encased in amorphous silica matrices up to 5 µm thick. Relative radiation absorbance of these silica matrices was UV‐C > UV‐B > UV‐A > PAR, suggesting the silica provides a significant UV shield to the cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria also occur in cryptoendolithic communities 1–10 mm below siliceous sinter surfaces, and in siliceous stromatolites, where viable cyanobacteria are found at least ∼10 mm below the sinter surface. UV‐B was dramatically attenuated within ∼1 mm of the sinter surface, whereas UV‐C (a frequency range absent today but present in the early Precambrian) was attenuated even more efficiently. PAR was attenuated the least, and minimum PAR levels required for photosynthesis penetrated 5–10 mm into the sinter. Thus, a favourable niche occurs between approximately 1–10 mm in siliceous sinters where there is a balance between PAR transmission and UV attenuation. These deposits also would have strongly attenuated Archean and early Precambrian levels of UV and thus, by analogy, cyanobacteria of early Precambrian shallow aquatic environments, inhabiting silicified biofilms and silica stromatolites, would have similarly been afforded protection against high‐intensity UV radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".